We have possession a dozen+ emails related to a $100k assessment increase for a building permit that was done with no proper procedure or financial  basis.  Eventually an assessment worksheet with no initials or signature of Assessor was produced showing someone had used crayons/water colors instead of a pencil/pen for the arbitrary work that took dozens of hours to undue.  Demands were made to three Assessors with Camacho on the emails for the name of the person who did the assessment and no name was ever given. We were to accept the idea that a "nameless" Assessor could do such sloppy work with no recourse.  When the unjust assessment was reversed,  it was exposed the worksheet they had given also had other relevant errors on it that they should have known were errant when it was presented in person at the Assessor Counter. While at the Assessor counter witnesses over heard two obscene stories comparable but with far higher dollar value -- and they watched Assessors act as if they were appraisers, accepting expensive appraisals that had to be generated to start disputes.    This is mentioned briefly in the full audit document.  Thus, introductory concerns for far larger criminal assessing activity are in fact included here but they were not made prominent, so as not to detract from the other concerns that need to be addressed first.