1. 2011-2016 - Payroll reporting methodology consistent. Pay is high and goes to extremely high in 2015 with a  40% base pay jump with no change in job title or apparent work load.  (Total Pay + Benefits ranges from 106k to 172k)

2. 2017-2022 -  Payroll reporting methodology becomes inconsistent year over year ("gypsy" style reporting via the payroll department).  Total Pay and Benefits no longer reported totalled at bottom.  Items and subtotal out of order.  (Total Pay + Benefits ranges from 166k to 230k with no change in job title. )

3. 2023-2024 - Assumes Assessor-Clerk-Recorder role -- Total Pay + Benefits range from 342k to 366k.  

NOTE:   2011-2022 reporting obtained from "open payrolls" -- 2023/2024 not avail via them
2023-2024 reporting obtained from transparent CA -- with less delineation on line items

We have possession a dozen+ emails related to a $100k assessment increase for a building permit that was done with no proper procedure or financial  basis.  Eventually an assessment worksheet with no initials or signature of Assessor was produced showing someone had used crayons/water colors instead of a pencil/pen for the arbitrary work that took dozens of hours to undue.  Demands were made to three Assessors with Camacho on the emails for the name of the person who did the assessment and no name was ever given. We were to accept the idea that a "nameless" Assessor could do such sloppy work with no recourse.  When the unjust assessment was reversed,  it was exposed the worksheet they had given also had other relevant errors on it that they should have known were errant when it was presented in person at the Assessor Counter. While at the Assessor counter witnesses over heard two obscene stories comparable but with far higher dollar value -- and they watched Assessors act as if they were appraisers, accepting expensive appraisals that had to be generated to start disputes.    This is mentioned briefly in the full audit document.  Thus, introductory concerns for far larger criminal assessing activity are in fact included here but they were not made prominent, so as not to detract from the other concerns that need to be addressed first.